I was raised on a small farm in the middle of nowhere, Ohio.
The barns were old. Really old. Full of bent nails, rusty screws, scrap lumber, broken handles, forgotten hardware, and all the leftover pieces of work from decades before I was born. As a kid, I spent hours climbing through rafters and digging through corners, looking for whatever parts and pieces I could gather to build something of my own. Cabins. Tables. Benches. Little worlds assembled from whatever was close at hand.
I didn’t know it then, but that was the foundation of my design ethos.
The basic function was usually the only thing I knew for sure. I knew what I wanted something to do. The rest was formed by what was available. The material suggested the shape. The scraps started the conversation. The form followed what was at hand.
I think Thomas Edison said it well: To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk.
That feels true to me.
My first real shop was a ten-by-ten frame made from pallet runners and old barn siding. I had an old Craftsman power drill that I used to pre-drill hard oak. I drove ancient nails through the frame with a dusty claw hammer I found in a Folgers can stashed away on a high shelf. It was rough, crooked, improvised, and perfect. It was mine. My sanctuary from the world.
I still remember the day I drove my 1988 Oldsmobile to Menards to buy a few bags of concrete so I could pour the floor.
It was the first time I had ever purchased anything while building something, and I remember how strange it felt.
That may sound odd, but up until then, building had always begun with what was already there. The idea that I might need to go buy the ingredients for making something felt foreign to me. Almost like I was skipping a step. Like I was interrupting the natural order of the thing.
Even now, that early instinct still shapes the way I work.
I struggle deeply to bring something from nothing. Sitting at a desk and trying to conceive of greatness from a blank page has never been my strength. But give me a few hours with some old broken stuff, a leftover bar of steel, a worn piece of wood, a pile of offcuts, and my imagination starts to wake up.
That’s when the ideas come.
When I’m designing a product, I usually can’t sit still and think my way into the answer. I have to go out into the shop. Heat a leftover bar. Start forging. Begin with only the faintest sense of what I want the object to do when it’s finished. The making itself begins to reveal the shape.
After a few hours of that, I’m usually desperate to see it succeed because now my mind has something to hold onto. It has seen possibility. It has felt weight and proportion and motion. The rough work cools on the floor beneath the anvil, and suddenly the real questions begin to surface.
What would be a better steel for this?
Can I improve the grain flow?
How do I get rid of that cold shut?
Would a simple die help refine the shape?
Can I change the process steps to make the form cleaner, stronger, more repeatable?
That’s when my mind catches fire.
Not before the making, but because of it.
That matters to me.
Because I think we live in a world that starts too often with the question, What’s the best of everything? What’s the best material, the best machine, the best setup, the best version, the best money can buy. And I understand the appeal. We have access to more than any generation before us. The world’s bounty is practically at our fingertips.
But I don’t think abundance always makes us better builders.
Sometimes it makes us less attentive.
Less connected.
Less imaginative.
There is something deeply human about beginning with what you have. About looking around the place where you’ve been planted and asking, What’s already here? What can I do with this? That question produces a different kind of work. Work with a story. Work shaped by place. Work that belongs to a person, a region, a set of limitations, a real life.
That kind of making feels connected to the founders of this country.
They arrived here with little more than ships, simple tools, and the courage to begin. They looked at the forest around them and saw homes, fencing, furniture, fuel, shelter. The form followed what was at hand. Over time, the forms became more refined. The methods improved. The processes became more sophisticated. But the beginning was simple: what is available, and what can I make from it?
That question built a nation.
And I still think it is a better question than the one we usually ask now.
Because “what’s the best of everything?” rarely has a soul.
It often has no place in it. No story. No coherence. No real agreement between the thing and the life surrounding it. It is too easy to buy a pile of premium ingredients and still make something hollow.
But to build from what is already here — to work with the materials, skills, and opportunities near at hand — that creates something different.
It creates a journey.
It invites refinement instead of fantasy.
It asks you to pay attention, to solve problems, to listen to the material, to let the process shape you while you shape the object.
And maybe that’s why it feels more honorable to me.
Not because using better things is wrong. Not because refinement doesn’t matter. It does. Deeply. I care a great deal about refinement. About better steel, better design, better process, better feel in the hand. But refinement means more when it grows out of honest work. When it comes after the first rough making. When it is earned through attention instead of purchased all at once.
That is a better road.
Start with what you have.
See what it (and you) can become.

Creativity in this sense is such a wonderful task to undertake. Surely it harkens back to the beginning and being created ourselves in the image of a master Creator.